Practical Neurology

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Practical Neurology 2008;8:5
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Warlow, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Warlow, C.

Editor’s choice

Charles Warlow

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

It is a strange irony that although many cardiologists are far from humble, the test that they have used on almost all their patients day in and day out for decades is, in the words of Phil Smith and his colleagues on page 48, the "humble electrocardiogram". For such a high tech speciality this is truly amazing. Even us more plodding neurologists have more or less abandoned our old favourites like the skull x ray, the EEG, which is now far less useful than it used to be (was it ever?), and even examining the cerebrospinal fluid is a much less popular pastime (there will not be many readers who remember the colloidal gold curve). But the humble ECG carries on looking much the same as ever it did—albeit it is quicker, easier and less messy than when my generation of housemen carted round the heavy machines from ward to . . . [Full text of this article]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.